Regular AussieRulesBlog readers will have gleaned that I am a devoted Bomber. Without quibbling about the result, I'm left to wonder what the differences are between Nathan Lovett-Murray's three-week bump and Nick Maxwell's get-off-scott-free bump during the pre-season. I think Lovett-Murray was dumb and he is a serial offender, so three weeks is fair enough.
Let's think about the two scenarios. Both were clearly late. Tick. Both involved somewhat incidental(?) contact to the opponent's head. Tick. Lovett-Murray gave Pettifer a bloodied nose, Maxwell broke McGinnity's jaw. Huh?
[Edit, 27 May: When I wrote this, I was having a daydream (apparently) and avoided remembering that the Match Review Panel actually cited Maxwell and awarded a penalty of weeks. It was an expensive counsel and a legal technicality that saved Maxwell.]
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
It's enough to make a person wonder
Regular AussieRulesBlog readers will have gleaned that I am a devoted Bomber. Without quibbling about the result, I'm left to wonder what the differences are between Nathan Lovett-Murray's three-week bump and Nick Maxwell's get-off-scott-free bump during the pre-season. I think Lovett-Murray was dumb and he is a serial offender, so three weeks is fair enough.Let's think about the two scenarios. Both were clearly late. Tick. Both involved somewhat incidental(?) contact to the opponent's head. Tick. Lovett-Murray gave Pettifer a bloodied nose, Maxwell broke McGinnity's jaw. Huh?
[Edit, 27 May: When I wrote this, I was having a daydream (apparently) and avoided remembering that the Match Review Panel actually cited Maxwell and awarded a penalty of weeks. It was an expensive counsel and a legal technicality that saved Maxwell.]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's enough to make a person wonder
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
|
|
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 26, 2009
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
2 comments:
- Kick2Kick said...
-
Its because Collingwood run the AFL...
- 27 May 2009 at 14:47:00 GMT+10
- Murph said...
-
To give the Match Review Panel their due, they did cite Maxwell and award a penalty of weeks. It was an expensive counsel and a legal technicality that extracted Maxwell from the MRP's clutches.
It's always entertaining to lay the blame at Collingwood's feet, but often not accurate. - 27 May 2009 at 22:46:00 GMT+10
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Its because Collingwood run the AFL...
To give the Match Review Panel their due, they did cite Maxwell and award a penalty of weeks. It was an expensive counsel and a legal technicality that extracted Maxwell from the MRP's clutches.
It's always entertaining to lay the blame at Collingwood's feet, but often not accurate.
Post a Comment