“The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction.”
This description, from the AFL website, refers to the charge against Essendon’s Ryder.
I defy anyone to seriously suggest that Hodge’s actions immediately prior to Ryder’s do not fall within the same category. This incident was prior to the third quarter collision between Lloyd and Sewell.
Pathetic by the Match Review Panel — a travesty of justice.
Monday, August 31, 2009
A travesty of justice
“The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction.”This description, from the AFL website, refers to the charge against Essendon’s Ryder.
I defy anyone to seriously suggest that Hodge’s actions immediately prior to Ryder’s do not fall within the same category. This incident was prior to the third quarter collision between Lloyd and Sewell.
Pathetic by the Match Review Panel — a travesty of justice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A travesty of justice
Monday, August 31, 2009
|
Labels:
Match Review Panel
|
This entry was posted on Monday, August 31, 2009
and is filed under
Match Review Panel
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment