In the space of two weeks, we've traversed from rushed behinds that were virtually universally-acknowledged to warrant a free kick to an accidental rushed behind that is penalised under the new rule and which, I suspect, will be virtually universally-acknowledged as completely the wrong decision.
The ONLY saving grace was the Collingwood player's sporting kick ;-) to hit the opposite behind post and so not register a score.
Since it was an umpire who made the blunder, there's only one practical response: Release the Giesch!!
Friday, February 27, 2009
Beyond farce
In the space of two weeks, we've traversed from rushed behinds that were virtually universally-acknowledged to warrant a free kick to an accidental rushed behind that is penalised under the new rule and which, I suspect, will be virtually universally-acknowledged as completely the wrong decision.The ONLY saving grace was the Collingwood player's sporting kick ;-) to hit the opposite behind post and so not register a score.
Since it was an umpire who made the blunder, there's only one practical response: Release the Giesch!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Beyond farce
Friday, February 27, 2009
|
Labels:
Rushed behinds,
Umpiring
|
This entry was posted on Friday, February 27, 2009
and is filed under
Rushed behinds
,
Umpiring
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
2 comments:
- Anonymous said...
-
That was a rubbish decision. you think he kicked it out on the full on purpose?
- 27 February 2009 at 11:09:00 GMT+11
- Murph said...
-
No, mate. Just being very facetious! If he could make that kick to order he'd be the most valuable player in the competition.
- 27 February 2009 at 11:25:00 GMT+11
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
That was a rubbish decision. you think he kicked it out on the full on purpose?
No, mate. Just being very facetious! If he could make that kick to order he'd be the most valuable player in the competition.
Post a Comment