Dust off the stake in the town square and pile up the faggots*, people! It's heresy time again!
I am sick to death of hearing every week what a fantastic player Simon Prestigiacomo is. It's time to call a spade a spade! The bloke HOLDS his opponent, denying them a fair chance to compete FOR THE BALL. His supporters will say he rides the ragged edge of the interpretation of holding. I reckon that's rubbish and the umpires apply a different set of rules to this guy.
If it were any other player, they'd be free-kicked a dozen times a game, but Prestigiacomo is a PROTECTED SPECIES. In almost every game, other players ARE free-kicked for clearly less-substantial holding.
Collingwood fans will be lining up to tell me that Lloyd and Hird are and have been protected species, but they were making the ball their objective.
Take a look at Fletcher, an elite defender for more than a decade and a half, making the ball his objective and beating his opponents by, more often than not, beating them to the ball. What a contrast with the ugly, negative tactics of Prestigiacomo!
The AFL dream up new rules and interpretations to make contests "fairer" — the so-called "hands in the back" interpretation, for instance — but do nothing to remove a blight like Prestigiacomo's tactics. It's a scandal and everyone who lauds Prestigiacomo is sullying our game.
* See here.
Friday, July 03, 2009
If it was any other player. . .
Dust off the stake in the town square and pile up the faggots*, people! It's heresy time again!I am sick to death of hearing every week what a fantastic player Simon Prestigiacomo is. It's time to call a spade a spade! The bloke HOLDS his opponent, denying them a fair chance to compete FOR THE BALL. His supporters will say he rides the ragged edge of the interpretation of holding. I reckon that's rubbish and the umpires apply a different set of rules to this guy.
If it were any other player, they'd be free-kicked a dozen times a game, but Prestigiacomo is a PROTECTED SPECIES. In almost every game, other players ARE free-kicked for clearly less-substantial holding.
Collingwood fans will be lining up to tell me that Lloyd and Hird are and have been protected species, but they were making the ball their objective.
Take a look at Fletcher, an elite defender for more than a decade and a half, making the ball his objective and beating his opponents by, more often than not, beating them to the ball. What a contrast with the ugly, negative tactics of Prestigiacomo!
The AFL dream up new rules and interpretations to make contests "fairer" — the so-called "hands in the back" interpretation, for instance — but do nothing to remove a blight like Prestigiacomo's tactics. It's a scandal and everyone who lauds Prestigiacomo is sullying our game.
* See here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
If it was any other player. . .
Friday, July 03, 2009
|
Labels:
Prestigiacomo
|
This entry was posted on Friday, July 03, 2009
and is filed under
Prestigiacomo
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment